How to make sick people Medicalization = healthy society
The problem is not serious pandemics invented ( Anthrax, SARS, Avian, Swine, etc.. ) from 'medico-scientific establishment, but their "remedies" -drugs-vaccines poisons . no coincidence that ours is an era marked by "disease mongering " (" commodification of the disease," " creation of disease"), ie the criminal ruthless marketing operation, aimed at creating true and their disease (see high cholesterol, osteoporosis, disease epidemics, pandemics, etc.). and the medicalization of normal aspects of life ( pregnancy, childbirth, menopause, old age, etc.. ) with the dual aim of passing off and sell drugs on the one hand and have control of other people.
A sick person (even if objectively it is healthy) is not a free person. A person is not free and easily manipulated ...
How is this "medicalization of society ?
On 25 June 2005, the BJM" British Medical Journal "( the journal of the British caste of white coats ) warns of 'excessive medicalization and the continuing reduction in the normal range of blood pressure and cholesterol .
What does this alarm?
means that the lobbies of the drug with the combination of international health institutions continue to lower the values \u200b\u200bof "normal ( blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides, blood glucose, bone density, etc.. ) on the one hand, and increase the "mass screening " on the other, making it "sick " millions of people, objects, sound! These people " healthy", with the complacency / ignorance of doctors, will be " cured" with drugs and / or poisons, poisoned and making them sick for real.
technically takes place in three steps:
1) PLAN QUANTITY: lower the thresholds
Here are some examples:
Triglycerides : - "normal" in June 2003: 200 mg / dL (2.3 mmol / L) - New "normal" (July 2003): 150 mg / dL (1.7 mmol / L) means that at the end of June 2003 who had triglycerides 150 mg / dL to 200 mg / dL were healthy and sick from July 1st!
Cholesterol : - treatment if LDL> 115 mg / dL ( 3 mmol / L) in June 2003 - New parameter if LDL> 100 mg / dL ( 2.6 mmol / L) in July 2003 means that at the end of June 2003 who had LDL cholesterol of 100 mg / dL to 115 mg / dL were healthy, and from July 1 instead sick! We're talking about tens of millions of people!
Diabetes : - "normal" if glucose \u0026lt;140 mg / dL (until 2000) - New parameter if glucose \u0026lt;126 mg / dL (after 2000) means that in 2000, those who had glucose levels of 126 mg / dL to 140 mg / dL were healthy, while on New Year's sick!
The same applies to the values \u200b\u200bof blood pressure that a normal \u0026lt; 160/90 mmHg is now been brought to \u0026lt;130/80 mmHg . Today we are virtually all "hypertensive .
2) "FLOOR TIME: EARLY DIAGNOSIS
With Mass Screening are encouraged by the fear and psychological terrorism, objectively healthy people to look for some disease that no one wants to have. An example: mammography in unison that doctors often advise and recommend to women over a certain age, need or not?
He says the conclusion of the study dell'ufficialissimo Cochrane Collaboration is published in the Cochrane Systematic Review "in 2006.
" For every 2000 women attending the screening, one will, after 10 years, life prolonged (1 death from breast cancer prevented over 2,000 women who did the mammogram). 10 will be treated for breast cancer in a non-necessary (overtreatment). So : 0.5 deaths prevented per 1000 women who have mammograms for 10 years, compared to 1000 women who undergo screening mammography . That is to say, " not statistically significant and economically burdensome to no avail. "
Not to mention the devastating psychological effects of "false positives " for those who perform mammography: l ' examination reveals something (nodule, tumor, cancer, etc.). that there really is not. 242 women in 1000 will have just a very " suspected diagnosis of breast cancer not confirmed after further examinations. (Barrat et al, British Medical Journal 2005).
Then the false positive rate is around 24%. How many of these women will be made in vain? How many of these women, due to the stress of diagnosis, may trigger mechanisms psycho-physical ("nocebo effect") very dangerous, leading to an actual disease? ....
3) "qualitative" NEW DISEASES
In this case, the examples are so numerous that for problems space is not possible to list them: osteoporosis, premenstrual syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, etc..
ROME - The first artificial hand controlled by the human brain has opened the door to the future. Two or three years will be enough to get a hand much smaller and lighter than the current much more versatile, and perhaps in a short period as they exit the stage to try to get cyberprotesi wearable and permanent. E 'scenario presented today in Rome by University Biomedical Campus, and Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna in Pisa, in charge of the world's first experiment in which a patient who had lost his right hand in a car accident he checked with his brain movement of a hand of steel, aluminum and titanium two kilograms heavier. The connection between the artificial hand and nervous system were four electrodes, each much thinner than a hair, implanted in two nerves of his left arm. - Efficient: The intervention was conducted in November 2008, the following month was dedicated to testing, after which he worked for 11 months of data analysis, said the scientific director of the Research Center of Biomedical Campus, Paul Maria Rossini. "Now we know we have a system that knows how to classify the characteristics of three types of motion with an efficiency close to 100%." - AS IN FORMULA ONE: "The research started many years ago, with the first studies conducted on man-machine in 1984. Since then progress has been continuous and, as in the cars of Formula One, we've added new parts every week, "said Paolo Dario, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna and the father of the project along with Maria Chiara Carrozza. - SMART HAND: the bionic hand LifeHand just experienced in the project already has a successor, SmartHand, which weighs 600 grams. Ideally, Dario noted, is to get a hand to the lost of 400-500 grams. "We can not run the car in Formula One, but prepare the potential, "said Silvestro Micera, Sant'Anna School. - AN EXTRAORDINARY PATIENT: Pierpaolo Petruzziello, the Brazilian patient of Italian origin who has lost his right hand in a car accident, was selected from 30 volunteers. Now it's time to seek new candidates for the next steps are that the selection will be long and difficult. - Electrodes: two nerves were disconnected from the patient after one month, as a precautionary measure. "At first glance appear to be in excellent condition and more efficient," said Klaus Peter Hoffmann, the German IBMT them has developed. - THE FUTURE: "There will be new projects only when we have a technology that allows us to move forward," said Ross. We must have a powerful interface, permanent electrodes, miniaturization that will lead to a hand 'portable' and algorithms contained in a microchip implanted. Maria Chiara Carrozza for "encouraging results allow us to look to the development of research on prosthetic hands with the necessary caution, but with justified confidence supported by scientific evidence." The one announced today, he added, is "a positive milestone" in general "for the Italian research, which has proven to be a team and be able to support prestigious international partners."
NEW YORK. Children who regularly spend time outdoors are less likely than their peers who prefer to stay indoors to become myopic, according to researchers. In several studies published in the journal Optometry and Vision Science, scientists show that children who spend more 'time outdoors during the day tend to have a better view from a distance than those who choose indoor activities. The reasons are not clear, but the phenomenon does not seem to depend on the levels of physical activity, but rather, exposure to sunlight may play a role.
Also, being outdoors often forces children to focus on objects in the distance and animal studies suggest that this effect development of the eye helping to prevent myopia.
other hand, new studies have found no evidence to show unequivocally that work by focusing its attention increasingly on nearby objects - such as reading or using a computer - increases the risk of myopia of children.
In one of the searches, Dr. Jane Gwiazda and Li Deng of the New England College of Optometry in Boston have submitted a questionnaire to parents of 191 children aged 13 years and measured the views of children each year.
Overall, the researchers found that children who developed myopia outdoor spend on average 8 hours per week, compared with 13 hours of non-myopic children. Children also tended to look more myopic television, while a correlation was not found in time spent reading, studying or using the computer. In two other studies - one Australian, the other from Singapore - the researchers found similar connections between time spent outdoors and a lower risk of myopia.
Rome, October 6 (Reuters) - pasta, vegetables, fish, a bit 'of wine, lots of fruit and olive oil here is the recipe to beat the depression at the table. To promote the Mediterranean diet is a team of English researchers from the University of Las Palmas (Canary Islands) and the University of Navarra in Pamplona, \u200b\u200bauthors of a study published in 'Jama'. Scientists led by Miguel Martinez-Gonzalez University of Navarra have discovered that the faithful of the Mediterranean diet are 30% less vulnerable to depression than others. To find out, the experts studied 10,094 healthy people for over four years, subjecting them to a questionnaire on dietary habits and tracked during the search. Well, the researchers saw that more faithfully follow the Mediterranean-type diet were mostly men, ex-smokers, married and not so young: They are also detected more active than others. In the course of the study were diagnosed 480 new cases of depression, 156 males and 324 females. But the faithful of the Mediterranean diet have shown a risk of getting exactly 30% less than the others. This in spite of variables such as numbers of children, lifestyle or personality traits such as anxiety and tendency to competitiveness. According to Martinez-Gonzales results should be confirmed by larger studies, but the inverse correlation between depression and Mediterranean menu is strong. " Although still in the protective mechanism of this diet, have proved beneficial for the heart and vessels, to be unveiled.
The Mediterranean diet is one of which the Italians should be teachers, and the demand created by a group of researchers at the University of Florence: Francesco Sofi, Francesca Cesari, Rosanna Abbate, Gian Franco Gensini, Alessandro Casini, specializing in clinical nutrition and internal medicine. The Florentine team of experts carried out a meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies, prospective, for a total of 1,574,299 participants, who had investigated the relationship between adherence to Mediterranean diet, mortality and incidence of chronic diseases in primary prevention. And the answer is yes: those who follow more strictly the diet better and live longer. "Well, it seems that a regular membership to the dictates of the Mediterranean diet, rich in olive oil, carbohydrates, fruits, vegetables and fish with a moderate consumption of red wine with meals, protect against a range of chronic diseases, from heart disease to cancer, but also from typical ills of old age like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease says Sofi.
Sometimes, in all good faith, it gives a voice to campaigns in support of patients suffering from various diseases, including cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, etc.., unaware that these diseases are often behind the disturbing background, who speak of personal and financial interests by those who spread news that affect the emotions (the fear, panic!) of the common people.
THE FRAUD OF AIDS
"HIV" IS THE NAME OF A TRUE (EVEN THOUGH HARMLESS) AIDS VIRUS IS A TRUE SYNDROME IMMUNODEFICIENCY. THE FRAUD IS THAT THERE IS NO SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN CORRELATION BETWEEN HIV AND AIDS, WORLDWIDE IS MADE AS believes the opposite.
There have long been some books about this subject, but I would like to bring to the attention of all those who love freedom and truth of information is emblematic of the article Professor Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1993 .
Kary Mullis has become a legend for his discovery of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) a technique that has revolutionized the world of chemistry and genetics.
The article below is taken from the book by Kary Mullis, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, trans. ital. Dancing Naked in the Mind Field , Baldini & Castoldi, Milano, 2000, pp. 180-192. For once, for a good cause, in defiance of the copyright, SPREAD THESE PAGES AS POSSIBLE. ALSO HAVE OTHER THIRST FOR TRUTH!
Better yet ... invited people to buy the book Mullis! CD
THE CASE IS NOT CLOSED of Kary Mullis
When in 1984 I heard for the first time that French Luc Montagnier, Pasteur Institute and Robert Gallo, of 'America's National Institutes of Health, discovered independently that the retrovirus HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus - the cause of AIDS was, I accepted the data as any scientific evidence.
The problem is not strictly my area, the biochemistry, ed'altronde them were experts of retroviruses.
Four years later I worked as a consultant with Specialty Labs of Santa Monica : We were looking at ways to use PCR to detect retroviruses in thousands of blood donations that the Red Cross received every day. I was writing a report progress, for the sponsor of the project, and began by stating that "HIV is the probable cause of AIDS." I asked a virologist at the Specialty where I could find evidence confirming the fact that HIV was the cause of AIDS. "You do not need," he was told. "It's something that everybody knows." I'd like to mention any of the information "I felt ridiculous for not knowing the source of a discovery so important. It seemed that everyone else knew. "Why did not cite the report of the CDC?" She suggested, handing a copy of the periodic report on morbidity and mortality Center for Disease Control . I read it. It was not a scientific article. It merely stated that a body had been identified, but did not explain how. Called on doctors to inform the Centre whenever they were faced with patients with certain symptoms, and tested for the presence of antibodies to this organism. The report did not refer to original research, but this did not surprise me. It was intended for doctors who did not need to know the source of information. From their point of view, if the CDC was convinced, had to exist, somewhere, was the proof that HIV causes AIDS.
is usually considered adequate proof from the scientific point of view an article published in a scientific journal reliable. Today the magazines are printed on glossy paper, full of photographs, articles written by professional journalists, and there are also pictures of girls who advertise products that could be useful in the laboratory. To advertise are companies that offer products that are useful to scientists, or that produce drugs that doctors should prescribe. All the major magazines contain advertisements. And consequently, they all have some relationship with the companies.
Scientists propose the articles to describe their research. For the career of a scientist is vital to write articles describing their work and be able to get them out, not to have published articles magazines is listed as a loss of prestige, however, the articles can not be offered until the experiments that support the theories are not concluded and evaluated. The most important magazines prompted them to return, either directly or through quotations, the details of the experiments, in so that other researchers can repeat them precisely and see if they get the same results.
If things go differently, it is made public, and the conflict must be resolved so that when the search will be resumed, it is known with certainty from that point again . The most qualified among the major magazines have a review system. When an article is submitted for publication, the Director sends a copy to occur because the author's colleagues, so-called reviewers. The directors are paid for their work, the auditors did not, but it's still a job that gives them power, which usually is enough to satisfy them.
I did some searching on your computer. It Montagnier nor Gallo nor others had published articles describing experiments which led to the conclusion that probably the HIV caused AIDS. I read the articles published in Science , that made them famous as "AIDS doctors", but everything that was written was that they had found in some patients with AIDS traces of a previous infection by an agent pathogen was probably HIV. had discovered antibodies. However, antibodies against certain viruses had always been considered a sign of disease rather than the previous illness. Antibodies indicated that the virus had been defeated, and the patient was saved. The articles did not say at all that this virus causes a disease, nor was that all persons who had antibodies in their blood were sick. In fact, antibodies were found in the body of healthy individuals.
If Montagnier and Gallo were unable to find this kind of evidence, because their articles were published, and had discussed it so hard to take credit for their discovery?
There had been an international incident when Robert Gallo NIH stated that a sample of HIV had received from Luc Montagnier , of 'Pasteur Institute in Paris, had not then developed in his laboratory. Other samples collected from Gallo and his colleagues from potential AIDS patients, however, were developed. Based on these samples Gallo had patented a test for AIDS, Pasteur Institute had sued. In the end, the court gave reason to Pasteur, but in 1989 it was still in a stalemate, and the two institutions will share the profits.
hesitate to write that "I'HIV is the probable cause of AIDS," I wanted first of evidence, published to that effect. My statement was very limited in my request for funds did not want to argue that the virus was undoubtedly the cause of AIDS, I was just trying to say that it is likely that it was, for reasons known to us.
Tens of thousands of scientists and researchers were spending billions of dollars each year for research that were based on this idea. The reason for all this he had to be written somewhere, otherwise these people would not allow his research focuses on so narrow hypothesis.
time I held conferences PCR on a multitude of conventions. And there are always people who spoke of HIV. I asked them what it was based on the certainty that this was a virus causing AIDS. They all had some response, at home, office, or in a drawer somewhere. Everyone knew, and I would send the information back soon. But I never got anything, no one ever sent me an explanation of how HIV causes AIDS.
In the end, I had the opportunity to ask this question to Montagnier, when he held a conference in San Diego the inauguration of the ' UCSD AIDS Research Center, today headed by former wife Robert Gallo, Dr. Flossie Wong-Staal . Would be the last occasion when I asked this question without losing patience. The response of Montagnier was a suggestion: "Why does not mention the report of the CDC?" I read, "I said," but not really answered the question of whether HIV is the probable cause of AIDS, right? "Montagnier they agreed I was very annoyed. If even he knew the answer, who the hell would have been able to know?
One evening I was in the car to go to Berkeley in La Jolla , when I heard on National Public Radio an interview with Peter Duesberg, a famous virologist at Berkeley. I finally understood why it was so difficult to find evidence on the relationship between HIV and AIDS: Duesberg claimed that no such evidence existed. No one had ever proved that HIV causes AIDS. The interview lasted about an hour and I stopped not to miss anything.
I had heard of Peter when I attended specialization at Berkeley. I was described as a very smart scientist, who had managed to map a particular mutation in a single nucleotide of what was then called an oncogene. In the sixties, was a challenge. Peter went on developing the theory that oncogenes may be introduced into the human virus and cause cancer. The idea was successful, and became a serious theoretical basis of research that was funded by the unfortunate name of 'War cancer. Peter was named "California Scientist of the Year". But rather than rest on their laurels, they burned. He managed to find weaknesses in his own theory, and told his colleagues that they were greatly surprised to find giving himself to do the experimental demonstration that was very unlikely that we will succeed. If they wanted to fight cancer, their research should be directed in another direction. But they, it was because they were more interested in fighting poverty rather than their cancer, or simply because they could not cope with their mistakes, continued to work for ten years, to no avail viral oncogene hypothesis. It could not to grasp the irony of the situation: the greater the frustration, the more they pick on you for Duesberg questioned his theory, and their absurdity.
Most of them had not learned much of what I call science . They were trained to obtain government funding, hire people to do research and write articles that usually concludes that the research had to be studied further, preferably by them, with someone else's money.
One of these was Bob Gallo .
Gallo was a friend of Peter. The two had worked for the same department of the National Cancer Institute .
Among the thousands of scientists who were engaged in vain to give a virus an important role in cancer development, Bob was the only claim to be so zealous able to be there. No one paid any attention to the thing, because he had only shown a relationship between sporadic and very weak antibodies against a harmless retrovirus called HTLV 1 and an unusual type of tumor identified on two of the southern islands of Japan.
Despite his lack of glory as a scientist, Gallo was able to easily scale hierarchies, while Duesberg despite his skills had declined. When you started talking about AIDS, Gallo was that he turned to Margaret Heckler when President Reagan decided he'd had enough of all those homosexuals who were demonstrating outside the White House. The Heckler was Minister for Education, Health and Welfare, and therefore the supreme head of the NIH. Bob Gallo had a sample of virus Montagnier had found in a lymph node of a gay Parisian interior designer with AIDS. Montagnier had sent the sample to Gallo because it assessed, and these men had taken possession in order to exploit it for their own careers. Margaret called a press conference and introduced Dr. Robert Gallo , which slowly took off his sunglasses and the world press announcement: "Gentlemen, we have found the cause of AIDS."
all.
Gallo and Heckler announced that within a couple of years would be available and a vaccine therapy. We were in 1984.
All former virus hunters of the National Cancer Institute changed the nameplates on the doors of their laboratories and became experts on AIDS. Reagan, for a start, settled around a billion dollars, and at any moment anyone could claim a scientific and medical specialization of some kind, and had not found much to do until then, he found a full-time job. What remains today.
name Human Immunodeficiency Virus was created by an international committee, in an attempt to resolve the dispute between Gallo and Montagnier , who had given different names to the virus. It was a test of short-sightedness, and an error that thwarted any attempt to investigate the causal relationship between the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) virus (HIV) human immunodeficiency.
Duesberg, speaking from the back, wisely remarked on Proceedings of the National Academy of Science that there was no reliable evidence on the involvement of the new virus. But it was completely ignored, his articles were refused, and committees of his colleagues began to doubt that it was necessary to continue to finance his research. Eventually, with what must be considered an act of incredible arrogance and contempt of science, which was part of a committee Flossie Wong-Staal , which was now openly siding against Duesberg, Peter decided not to renew the Distinguished Investigator Award , thus excluding funds for research. In this way, Duesberg was less dangerous to the AIDS establishment increasing : would no longer invited to speak at conferences organized by his former colleagues.
We live with an immeasurable number of retroviruses. They are everywhere, and are probably at least as old as the human race are part of our genome. We receive from our mothers some form of new viruses, infectious virus particles that migrate from mother to fetus. More from both of our parents, along with genes. Some of the sequences of our genome is made of retroviruses. This means that we can produce, and in some cases ineffective, our retroviral particles. Some of them may resemble HIV, but no one has shown that they have never killed anyone.
There must be a reason that justifies their existence: a quantifiable portion of our genome contains retroviral sequences human endogenous. Some claim that some portions of DNA are useless, but wrong. If there is something in our genes, there must be a reason. The body does not allow for the development clutter. I tried to insert irrelevant gene sequences in simple organisms like bacteria, but if they have reason to be if they release the bodies. And I hope that my body when it comes to DNA, at least is smart as a bacterium.
HIV is not suddenly jumped out of the rain forest or Haiti. You just finished in the hands of Bob Gallo, when he needed a new career. But he was always there: when you stop to look only in the streets of big cities, you realize that HIV is rarely spread everywhere.
If HIV had been there forever, and was transmitted from mother to child, does not make sense to look for antibodies in the body of the mother than anyone HIV-positive result, especially if the individual shows no signs of illness?
Imagine a guy in the heart of the United States, whose dream is to enlist in the Air Force after graduation and a pilot. He never used drugs, and all had the same high school sweetheart, with whom he has every intention of getting married. Unbeknownst to her, and everyone else also has antibodies to HIV, which he inherited from his mother, still alive, when she was in her womb. It is a healthy boy, and it has never created any problems, but when the Air Force shall submit to routine testing for HIV, his hopes and dreams crumble. Not only was his request for enrollment is rejected, but on his head also weighs a death sentence.
The CDC has identified AIDS as one of more than thirty diseases related to a positive test to detect antibodies to HIV. But these same diseases as AIDS are not defined if not detecting antibodies. If a woman develops an HIV-positive cervical cancer, for example, is considered ill with AIDS. An HIV-positive TB has AIDS, while if it only has a negative tuberculosis test.
If you live in Kenya or Colombia where HIV testing is too expensive, it is simply assumed to have the antibodies, and then AIDS. In this way it can be treated in a clinic of the WHO, which in some places is the only form of medical care available. It's free, given that countries that finance the WHO are afraid of AIDS. If we consider it as an opportunity to disseminate medical care in areas where poor people live, AIDS was a fortune. Do not poison them with AZT as we do with our fellow citizens, because it would cost too much. We provide them with the care for a machete wound on the left knee, and call it AIDS.
The CDC continues to add new diseases to the general definition of AIDS statistics virtually manipulated to ensure that the disease appears to be in constant circulation. In 1993, for example, the CDC has greatly expanded the definition of AIDS. A welcome choice to the local authorities that, due to Ryan White Act (a law passed in 1990 to provide assistance to AIDS patients, NDT) receive from the State $ 2,500 per year for each case of AIDS reported.
In 1634 Galileo was condemned to spend the last eight years of his life under house arrest for having written that the earth is not the center of the universe but on the contrary, revolves around the sun. He was accused of heresy, because he claimed that a scientific fact should not have anything to do with faith. In a few years, the fact that we have accepted the theory that AIDS is caused by HIV seems silly, as silly to us seem the authorities who excommunicated Galileo.
science, so as it is practiced today in the world, has very little science. And what people call 'science' probably is not much different from what was called science in 1634. Galileo was asked to recant his beliefs, otherwise it would have been excommunicated. And those who refuse to accept the commandments imposed by the establishment of AIDS is told more or less the same thing: "If you disagree with our point of view, you're out."
It is disappointing to see how many scientists have been refused in any way, to examine in an objective and dispassionate available data. Several authoritative scientific journals refused to publish a declaration by the Group for Reassessment Scientific Hypothesis HIV / AIDS merely requested "a careful review of available evidence for or against this hypothesis."
I faced this issue publicly for the first time in San Diego, during a conference of ' American Association for Clinical Chemists . I knew that I would be friends, devoted to AIDS and a small part of a long speech, no more than a quarter of an hour. I said as my inability to find any evidence had piqued my curiosity.
more you know, the more explicit. I could not remain silent: I was a responsible scientist, and I was convinced that there were people who were killed by drugs unnecessary. The answers I received from my colleagues ranged from mild acceptance to an express bitterness. When I was invited to Toledo by the European Federation of Clinical Investigation to speak of the PCR, I told them that I would rather talk HIV and AIDS. I do not think that, when accepted, they understood exactly what we were hunting. I had arrived in the middle of my speech when the president of the company abruptly interrupted me with a suggestion to answer questions from the audience. His attitude seemed to me very rude, and totally inappropriate, but what the hell? I would have answered the questions. He opened the debate, and then decided that he would place the first application in person. I realized that I was behaving irresponsibly? I felt that people could talk to stop using condoms? I replied that the statistics, quite reliable, produced by the CDC showed that, at least in the United States, all cases of venereal diseases were known on the rise, which showed that people did not use condoms, while AIDS cases, according to the original definition of the disease were declining. So, no, I did not think of being irresponsible. The president decided that was enough, and the meeting ended abruptly.
When I face this issue, the question that is asked is always the same: "if it is not HIV to cause AIDS, then cos 'is? "The answer is that I can not answer this question, more than know or do Gallo Montagnier. The fact that I know that there is no evidence that HIV causes AIDS does not make me an authority on real causes of the disease.
is no doubt that if a person has very close contacts with a large number of individuals, the immune system is intended to come into contact with a large number infectious agents. If a person has sexual contact three hundred a year - with people who in turn had sexual contact three hundred a year - this means that ninety thousand possibilities of contracting an infection in more than a person who has a monogamous relationship.
Think of the immune system as a camel, if you charge too much, slumps. In the seventies there was a significant number of men who traveled frequently and had a promiscuous lifestyle, sharing body fluids, drugs and a reckless life. It is likely that a homosexual who lived in a big city was exposed to almost any infectious agent that ever lived on a human body. In fact, if one were to organize a plan to collect all existing infectious agents on the planet could build Turkish baths very sociable and inviting people to attend. The immune system would react, but it would be struck down by the number of opponents.
The scientific problem is mixed with the moral. but what I am saying has nothing to do with morality. I do not speak of 'divine punishment' or other nonsense. A segment of our society was experiencing a lifestyle, and things did not go as planned. You are sick. Another segment of our pluralistic society so let's call physicians / scientists veterans of the lost war against cancer or just jackals professionals have found that it worked. It worked for them. They are still paying for their new BMW with our money.
I expressed in my previous writing one of my goals in these terms:
[...] To promote the development of cybernetics applied to organ transplants, with the creation of artificial organs, which would avoid the long waits associated purely random events of accidental deaths of likely donors, and also to force the procurement of organs (smuggling) drawing from living sources are not easily controllable (For example, children from Third World countries, where the registrar is approximate, mysteriously disappearing!). [...]
The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) has shown tremendous progress in the field of rehabilitation presented yesterday Claudia Mitchell, the first woman to be given the RIC technology. The first woman with a bionic arm.
The RIC is a bionic arm to neuro-control, and allows the patient to move the device as a real boom, just thinking. The arm allows patients moviemnti more natural, a wide range of motion and recovery of lost functions: using the knowledge derived from the key first implantation of a bionic arm , executed in Tennessee on Jesse Sullivan, Dr. Kuiken and his team have made significant advances in the area of \u200b\u200bsensory response, so the patient can actually 'feel' even if you are touching hot or cold.
"It 's gratifying to a physicist and a research scientist to reach a level that will produce a positive impact on the lives of amputees, including soldiers and soldiers of our army ", says Dr. Kuiken . " My team and I consider it a great honor to serve our country and citizens with disabilities from around the world. "
To provide the RIC neuro-controlled movement, nerves in the shoulder of the arm amputee are 'redirected' and related to the healthy muscles of the chest: this is called "targeted muscle reinnervation" and allows direct nerve signals directly to the bionic arm, as if it were the arm naturale.Le current artificial arms have only three engines: the bionic arm RIC includes a 6 engine, developed in collaboration with research laboratories around the world use different parts of the prosthesis simultaneously with the aim to recreate the natural movement of the arm.
Ms.Mitchell of Ellicott City is a U.S. Army officer who lost his left arm during a motorcycle accident in 2004. After reading Mr.Sullivan, the first 'planted' in a magazine, Ms. Mitchell has been in contact with the Dr.Kuiken, which he considered a viable candidate and then placed on the list for ' operation in 2005.
With Bionic Arm, Ms.Mitchell manages to have a fuller life: it carries out activities in support of other amputees in the Army National Naval Medical Center and Walter Reed Army Medical Center through his efforts as a volunteer, shares with others his personal message of gratitude and hope to soldiers returning from Iraq with serious injuries ..
"Before surgery, I doubted to be able to get back my life," says Ms.Mitchell. "This bionic arm and the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago returned I have a life more rewarding than I ever imagined. I am happy, confident and independent as a military veteran, I hope the Bionic technology provides benefits to all veterans with amputations. "
In the ancient world, in every house, there was an everyday object that beyond its practical utility, a hidden meaning "esoteric" very important. This object was the ' amphora, vase par excellence.
There are many biblical references around the vessels and, in the New Testament, Jesus referring to the Apostle John says: "I He is a vessel dear! . Why
to indicate a person used this metaphor? Because the geometry dell'anfora was that of a "heart " with " ears", and the man was considered just as " a heart with ears .
This definition implied that the true function of the ear was the deep feeling, while the surface was the hearing.
The left figure clearly shows that there is also a direct relationship between anatomically ears and heart through the vessels of the neck (carotid and jugular).
"I heard a noise in the hallway!" ....
"Do you realize how much you wan / ae bad person?" ....
"You are a / a child of a bad / ae do not deserve anything! Only so many penalties. "....
"Shut up and listen!" ....
"Why do you say these things? Enough! Enough! Not I want to hear anything! "....
"Do not cry, I am sick at heart" ....
"goes in one ear and out the other." ....
"Whatever people may say does not affect me. I am the best. "....
"Today I feel your ears plugged!" ....
mimed In the examples, above, were presented in summary form the various aspects of the function headset.
The first is the sense of hearing, which is therefore a purely mental-nervous.
The other concern but the aspect of perception, then "auditory sensitivity" and are in direct relationship to the "heart".
not normally do if the fact that a disorder can strike the right ear or left. In the common notions of what academic medicine is not relevant.
In the field of energy medicine is that instead of fundamental importance to the causes of the disorder.
The figure shows the causal elements of distinctive functional alteration and / or pathological ears, in relation to " laterality " right or left.
Everyone is so able to relate the phrases suggested in the examples, the relative laterality. In the press
pediatric medical official reported this statistic: More than 3 out of 4 children have suffered from catarrhal otitis media first three years of age.
As can be seen there is no reference to laterality, and it would be highly desirable that some researcher will elaborate on this: find with surprise the prevalence of left laterality in these conditions!
When a child has an ear infection left in the first three years of age, means that the environmental pressure has become unbearable and very painful for him, and in most cases is linked to parents' expectations.
Think of how much pressure are undergoing some children just because they can not do without diapers , and how many parents from removing these protective elements before the baby is ready to spontaneous sphincter control (and this just because the boyfriend / ao on / near the / a house has already done!), which has as a logical consequence nocturnal enuresis (bedwetting do) incontinence day (Piss be upon him), with screams and cries of reproach (especially by mothers!) and ridicule (by Dad) that can last for a long time.
not better the situation of school age who, to the expectations of parents (usually always in relation to the comparison / competition with other kids!), Are interacting with classmates with acceptance or removal / derision in relation to various elements including physics, elocution, ingenuity, skill, discrimination, social class, racism, etc..
An interesting example of how parental pressure can have dramatic consequences in the lives of an individual (and his sense of hearing) can be drawn from the biography of a musical genius Ludwig van Beethoven as .
Father musician who wants to force (and for personal prestige!) That the child was a child piano virtuoso of age, you become a phenomenon like Mozart, who composed his first symphony at the age of three years. One can well imagine what could be applied to the daily pounding little Ludwig who, while loving the music, Mozart had to deal with the phenomenon with the duty to emulate him, and then altering its deep musical sense. The first two symphonies by Beethoven are written, in fact, in Mozart's style, but not was that his music, what I feel in my heart. One can also imagine how, gradually, through repeated ear infections , the young Beethoven begins to isolate itself from the outside to reach the total deafness, the only condition that could provide insight into his music directly from the source: the heart. His most beautiful and majestic symphony, Symphony No. 9 "Ode to Joy" , wrote it in a perfect state of deafness, so no one has ever heard: he only felt .
This story also indicates the dynamics of the transition from a conflict situation in (left: induction, obligation, duty) to lock out (right: intention of isolation and exclusion), resulting in an alteration that becomes functional from pathologic ( otosclerosis), leading to deafness.
block output can be achieved even when the individual voluntarily exclude from their life interlocutor, namely the willingness to dialogue and sharing with others, concentrating on your own ego and feeling (creating) a wide gap d ' importance to himself and others.
The sentence given above ( "Why do you say these things?" Enough is enough! I do not want to hear nothing! ".... ), which is characteristic of the left side of the ear, where it exists, albeit painful, a dialogue with the external environment, would be transferred to the right side:
"How dare he say that? You do not know who I am! "
In this setting there is an obvious sense of importance ed'isolamento where that individual lives and, in my clinical experience, I noticed episodes of spontaneous rupture of the tympanic membrane in people who had a similar attitude, easily explained by the unwillingness to listen. If that attitude lasts long enough develops gradually deafness.
an intermediate stage between the importance and isolation, is one in which there is a sense of importance but must be recognized by others.
I can think of cases where " bullying in schools, where you create groups around a charismatic leader of the assumption, that affirm their superiority raging on individuals of a more mild (Even in business situations easily meet similar when there is a hierarchy of operations). All situations
highly at risk for inflammatory diseases and / or degenerative diseases of the ears, both those who oppress both those who suffer.
The heart which, as we said, is directly related to the ears, may be the negative impact of the various attitudes described above, ranging from extreme sensitivity to external events (anxiety, fear, panic) with palpitations and other forms of arrhythmia, the pathology disease (angina, myocardial) stiffness and insensitivity to emotional / affective against the external environment.
Conclusion
Listening is the wonderful feature of the ears and the music is the best support for the proper education of the Board.
A headset with music that spreads applied on the abdomen of a pregnant woman, brings joy and serenity to the unborn child and prepares him to deal with the trauma better sound (and unsound!) Birth. A reprimand
driven (not shouting!) And explained, no resistance and falls directly into the heart and fruitful.
Children have a natural tendency to aggregation and sharing through the game, so any induction of distinction, exclusivity and superiority, makes him a social misfit, because it will be unlikely to find someone to "your height" to talk to (Think of how difficult (and failures / faults) is expose these people when establishing a relationship of torque!).
In any case, observe and let their children express their innate quality is the best way to keep them healthy and in harmony with their peers and in general with the environment in which they live.
I am convinced that the true disease prevention is in the hands of parents and educators, rather than on clinical investigations, which always come later when the damage has been established, forcing the medicine to "patch up " the diseased part.
"Always listen to Mom and Dad! Even when Mom and Dad hit you, do it for your own good! "
" It's true, maybe, but what hurt the barrel! "
"Dad, why do I go to bed at nine?"
"Why do children go to bed at nine."
"But, Daddy, I did not sleep!"
"There go the same, because you get used to that you go to bed at nine."
At seven you need to get; to ' one must eat the three you begin to do their homework; the five should have a snack, dinner is at eight, at nine o'clock to bed ... ..
missing is that small stamp the tag! (Someone sooner or later we will think!).
This is just one example of what is being assimilated and taken for granted since childhood.
How many so-called " clichés (= things you take for granted)" Our daily life is full?
The state of our teeth represents a true reflection of what we agreed / or passively accept we rejected / reject , mental or justifications to assimilate rationally inductions of / conventions of family / environment.
To understand the effect of an impairment of any organ or system, you have to start from the knowledge of its normal function.
What is the normal function of teeth? The chewing! ( For those who were not familiar with the Italian language to the term "chewing " is assigned the value of "deep knowledge of a topic " (Example: Code that lawyer chew well!).
Every time we bring the food to the mouth, teeth grind, and transforming the bolus with saliva to allow it to swallow. The shredding process is also essential to activate the taste buds and then taste the food quality associated with the sense of liking or disgust.
Basically, then, prepare your teeth " analysis" of what we choose as food.
What is meant by "food ?
Food is any element from the external through a process of assimilation becomes part of the intimate structure of an individual, by feeding it in its entirety.
This definition, therefore, is not applicable only to the physical food (bread, pasta, tomatoes, chicory, etc..), But also to every thought, feeling, idea, behavior that the individual agrees to own.
I "cliches" are a real threat to the health of the teeth, because they tend to override the action of its own analysis of the "food" that passes through the chewing process.
People who have decayed teeth, usually not chew, but they swallow everything that comes to their mouth. Accept it as good as saying that everything suggests that the environment!
believe everything that is said in some cases even the most absurd things.
An example: My mother.
He lost all his teeth from a young age and that he has never questioned the veracity of what was being proposed.
"I saw a donkey fly" "Really? Where to? "... ...
People who instead have overlapping or crooked teeth are those trying in every way, giving himself a rational explanation forced to accept an even indigestible food, only to avoid conflict with the environment (many children and adolescents with appliances to realign teeth!).
People who refuse or resist but the food they brought (inductions), tend to mandibular prognathism (protruding jaw =), that shows his teeth.
People who have teeth are clearly critical and highly suspicious of everything and everyone.
People who have large teeth tend to gloss over important questions, showing a degree of superficiality trial (do not go deeply into knowledge).
serrano Those teeth are clearly closed to outside influences: the world begins and ends in themselves.
The diseases of the gums, the periodontal disease, teeth that move, expressing doubt, uncertainty, inability to express an opinion on things or on the events.
Conclusion
Toothpaste and toothbrushes are important in the prevention of some diseases (as I reported in another paper in the course of work), but they certainly are not effective in protecting teeth from decay.
True prevention of dental disease is achieved by teaching young, our children to express their views on any matter of everyday life. "What do you think about ...?" "Do you ... ..?" ....
Nice work for a genuine educator!
A critical common sense is the secret to keep teeth healthy for life.
