If it is cutting a tree immediately highlights a layered structure and concentration which, with dendrochronological analysis, you can trace the history of the (theoretically each ring of growth corresponds to a calendar year). The outer ring is the latest, the innermost the oldest.
You can also see how the layers are not perfectly separated from each other, but in some places, especially near nodes or beams, sheets neighbors, join in a single layer, making more surface that would been more profound.
These links surface-depth are closely related to individual variability and interaction with environmental conditions, so they have an inherent element of unpredictability.
All this indicates that two adjacent parts can share the structural aspects and, therefore, have far more in common than two parties together.
to the principle of correspondence that happens in a plant you can find in any other living being, as well as in the structure of the entire universe.
In developing embryo of an animal can be seen the same layering process for which the oldest parts are located in a position deeper than the latest.
Traditional and eloquent example is the next image, it is presented the development of the neural tube (the structure which will rise to the nervous system) in vertebrates.
What happens within an individual, is also in the phylogenetic tree: the more a living thing there is next in the evolutionary sequence, has more structural similarities with us, there are far fewer than its affinity with us.
These data are important when two people come into close contact with each other in the sense that one feeds the other.
Nature shows us clearly what happens when food is coming from a phylogenetic far or near.
The herbivores and frugivores, which eat phylogenetically distant sources, are the oldest animals, which can also reach old age, as well as giant moles (elephants, rhinos, hippos, etc.).
Carnivores instead that feed sources close phylogenetically, have much shorter life.
It 's interesting Note that these two groups of animals have a digestive system set in a totally different: In herbivores and frugivores food persists for a long time in the gut allowing maximum contact with the structures enabled the absorption of nutrients in carnivorous Instead, the transit is fast and touch minimized.
It seems that nature somehow protect the carnivorous possible drawbacks of prolonged contact with the elements of the intestinal mucosa. Nevertheless, the average life of carnivores is much shorter than that of herbivores-frugivores.
In human, at least at present, there is a total inconsistency, between those that are the natural predispositions (intestine long, prolonged persistence of food and prolonged contact of this with the intestinal mucosa, which are typical of herbivores-frugivores) and food choices with massive presence of products of animal origin (milk, dairy , cheese, salami, meat).
The immediate consequence of this power, which can be seen already from small age, is the frequency of diseases of the excretory organs, porvenienti overload of toxins in animal products, such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, asthma syndromes, urinary infections, intestinal dismicrobism , allergic dermatitis, etc..
0 comments:
Post a Comment